100% Cash and Out of Sample Returns

by: Mebane Faber October 09, 2008    
Mebane Faber

Mebane Faber

About this author:
Become a Contributor Submit an Article
  • Font Size:
  • Print

People email me every day asking how the timing model has held up during this market dump (short answer: great). The model is currently 100% in cash/bonds (more on that below). All returns are gross of management and transaction fees.

Here are out-of-sample results (meaning after I published the paper), from 2006-9/2008. (They would look better if you included October, of course.)  I think we are setting up for a monster Nov/Dec rally, but what do I know?

The model is doing what it was designed to do, namely, protecting capital as markets decline and achieving equity like returns with bond-like volatility.

click to enlarge:
----

I was going to title this post 10 things to do when you are sitting on 100% cash, but I didn’t think that was a good idea because 1) when you are beaming about how smart you are the market has a way of humbling you, and 2) there are a lot of people losing a lot of money, and that is nothing to gloat at. (PS - If the S&P closed here, it would be the third worst year ever since 1926...)

A reader emailed in asking how many times it occurred when the model was 100% cash (out of five positions). It turns out that has only happened 4 times since 1972-2008:

While this is a tiny statistical sample, I thought it would be interesting to see what the resulting returns were for the buy and hold portfolio over the following 12 months. The theory of course goes back to the old “buy when there is blood on the streets”. The 12-month performance for the four dates was :

6/30/1974, 11.34%
4/30/1980, 18.39%
9/30/1981, 14.11%
10/31/1981, 16.04%

That works out to an average of 14.97%, or about 3.5% higher than average. Thus, it’s usually a good time to be investing. What about when only one position is on (20% invested)?

9/30/1973, -19.43%
4/30/1974, 2.94%
5/31/1974, 8.54%
7/31/1974, 16.04%
8/31/1974, 8.68%
9/30/1974, 20.43%
10/31/1974, 17.07%
11/30/1981, 14.47%
3/31/1982, 32.98%
7/31/1984, 25.95%
8/31/1984, 19.00%
11/30/1987, 19.23%
12/31/1987, 18.46%
5/31/1990, 14.24%
12/30/1994, 22.74%
1/31/1995, 24.91%
9/30/1998, 11.35%
10/30/1998, 9.58%

Similar results at 14.84%, with about 3.4% abnormal returns.

With September being one of the worst months on record for stocks, the strategy of waiting a month then investing for 2 months could be a great time November 1st. For equities back to 1900, when stocks have declined by over -9%, the resulting "wait a month then invest for two months" offers good returns on average, but the range is large. The worst two month return would have been around -24%, and the best around 91%...That lines up nicely with the traditional year end rally.

Related Articles

This article has 3 comments:

  •  
    Oct 09 02:07 PM
    That post was very similar to the message board posts that I see everyday. ...like....

    "how to really pick stocks"
    "stop wasting your money"
    "amazing results"
    "I doubled my money in two days"
    "wow can you believe this"
    "double your money, just visit!"

    and my favorite.....

    "this program is blowing my mind"
    Reply | Link to Comment
  •  
    Oct 09 02:18 PM
    If you really want to double your money in a hurry .....

    fold it in half and put it in your pocket.
    Reply | Link to Comment
  •  
    Oct 09 02:57 PM
    Read the link to the paper from the Journal of Wealth Management before you make an uninformed post.

    papers.ssrn.com/sol3/p...
    Reply | Link to Comment
Top Rated Comment Streams:

Numbers are net rating-

See all Top 100 »
More by Mebane Faber

Investment Resources
Money Management
Research
Seeking Alpha provides these ads as a service to its leading contributors
Articles on related themes
Market Outlook
Market Strategy
Bonds
Dollar/Currencies