This Isn't a Bottom, It's a Disturbance in The Force
Think of the moment in the original Star Wars when the bad guys destroy Princess Leia's home planet of Alderaan with a single blast from the Death Star. Just then, back on Tatooine, Obi-Wan Kenobi shudders and says "I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. I fear something terrible has happened."
We've had a similar sensation here over the last few days as the latest data on mutual fund outflows reveal a time-honored pattern: When individual investors (and, yes, their panicky advisors) simply can't take the pain any longer, they dump stocks very late in the game.* Now, we want to be very clear here. These data alone don't imply a bottom any more than any other single indicator can. Especially when forced selling seems dominant and the credit markets remain broken.
But with the VIX setting daily records, put-call ratios pushing higher, and other measures of bearishness breaking out all over the place (this magazine cover is a classic contrarian item, but daunting and a little scary nonetheless), we could be reaching a point where the rubber band is stretched too tight--at least for the short term.
This morning's (for now very short-lived) hoot-and-holler reversal** off of the first half-hour's plunging lows notwithstanding, this market remains deeply damaged. Whatever current technical-psychological extremes might do to the broad averages in the short run, we continue to be concerned about the prospects for corporate earnings. Now, a loss of 40% or more in market capitalization certainly does imply an adjustment for expected weakness in earnings. But here's the thought experiment: What if the next few quarter's results are flat-out ugly? Is a steady drip of corporate weakness (and thus retrenched spending and hiring) adequately "priced in"?
At some point, when investors have shed their fear in favor of indifference, we'll have reached a real, lasting bottom, one that will have created some truly spectacular investment opportunities. As we've been arguing for months now, the name of the game is still risk management. Capital preservation is a virtue, as those who lives to fight another day will benefit enormously from the wreckage on Wall Street.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
* The bigger question is when those who have just bailed out of stocks will have the wherewithal to return. If they wait too long, they will have perfected the disastrous sell-low, buy-high sequence that impairs the results of so many individual investors. What people need here is discipline. If you go to cash now, start buying back in whether the market go higher or lower. If it goes lower, great...you'll pick up the merchandise at even better prices. If it bottoms at or near these levels and heads higher (even if slowly and unevenly), you won't wait too long to participate. We could be more specific about this, and maybe next week we will be.
** Which brought back memories of a time when CNBC's Maria Bartiromo actually squealed--there's no other word for it--her approval of the day's trading action. In keeping with the Star Wars theme, and given that stocks were trading roughly 40% higher then than they are now...that moment feels like it took place long ago, in a galaxy far, far away.
Source
Jennifer Ablan, "Flight to quality as money funds rise, stocks dive," Reuters, October 10, 2008
Jeff Kearns, "VIX Options Index Advances to Record Above 60 on Credit Freeze," Bloomberg, October 9, 2008
Related Articles
|



This article has 73 comments:
- sheople
- 29 Comments
Oct 10 04:22 PM- Smarty_Pants
- 828 Comments
My Website
Oct 10 04:31 PMDeath Star ... Federal Reserve
Tattooine ... Lehman Bros.
Obi-Wan ... Alan Greenspan
I see it clearly now. Darth Paulson will use the FORCE to unclog the credit system. Meanwhile R2Bernanke2 will stop the elevator's descent and turn it around to move upward again while Princess Bartiromo struggles to free herself from Jim Cramer the Hutt.
YES. It all makes sense.
- you_can_call_me_Al
- 45 Comments
Oct 10 04:52 PM- Socialism cannot compete!
- 330 Comments
Oct 10 04:56 PM- Engineer
- 36 Comments
Oct 10 04:58 PM- moonbat1775
- 564 Comments
My Website
Oct 10 05:02 PMObi-wan, "No --- just some gas." from "Hardware Wars"
- wyosteven
- 198 Comments
Oct 10 05:05 PM"R2Bernanke2"... ha ha ha!
- debtacid
- 105 Comments
Oct 10 05:08 PM- moonbat1775
- 564 Comments
My Website
Oct 10 05:09 PM- Msrpaul
- 15 Comments
Oct 10 05:36 PM- beenaround
- 2 Comments
Oct 10 05:45 PMAlso, sheople, I think the phrase you meant to come up with is, "I was born at night, but not last night".
- moonbat1775
- 564 Comments
My Website
Oct 10 06:01 PMNo, don't kill your self. Hang in there and UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES accept the mark of the beast (666). It might cost you your head but you will gain your soul forever.
I kid you not.
- Distressed Volatility
- 47 Comments
My Website
Oct 10 06:20 PM-distressedvolatility
- Fitz919
- 9 Comments
Oct 10 07:19 PMPersonally I think we saw the bottom today. I'll give you two thoughts on the subject...maybe three.
1. When Hank Paulson starts buying up those pesky Mortgage Backed Securities, the Credit Default Swaps designed to insure them will be voided, and nobody will have to pay the premiums any more.
2. Hank Paulson has the option of using the 700 Billion to buy Preferred Shares. Let's say he does that...the banks can now lend out 10 times that amount, ie 7 Trillion. But of course they first have to borrow the 6.3 Trillion from somewhere...maybe China?
3. Hank could do a hybrid of 1 & 2, buying the pesky securities for say... 15 cents on the dollar and then match it with a preferred shares purchase of an equal amount. This might sweeten the deal enough to get lots of bankers on board, and get us a bigger bang for our 700 Billion bucks.
Maybe I should call Hank.......
- raising4daughters
- 80 Comments
My Website
Oct 10 07:29 PM- sixpackistan
- 7 Comments
My Website
Oct 10 07:29 PM- sheople
- 29 Comments
Oct 10 07:50 PM- Jimmy Goodwin
- 50 Comments
Oct 10 08:08 PM- jcrash
- 248 Comments
Oct 10 08:11 PMJust as the call for $250 oil was a good time to sell, the calls of the coming apocalypse are a good time to buy. Sure no need to go all in if you want. Me, I plan to go down swinging. No sense sitting out the last fight, if that's what it is.
When things hit P:E of 1 (as some have) or a .25 price to sales ratio as others have, I think it is ok to start buying some things.
- Jimmy Goodwin
- 50 Comments
Oct 10 08:22 PM- moonbat1775
- 564 Comments
My Website
Oct 10 08:29 PMDo you expect him to tell the truth when our economic system is based on FALSE confidence? "Yes, we lent out 90% of your checking account, but don't worry, you can have all of your money at any time."
- JoeBlack
- 1 Comment
Oct 10 09:22 PMBest. Post. Ever.
- zalo
- 20 Comments
Oct 10 10:51 PMOne important thing to consider is that losses in the financial market are only nominal losses. Productive real assets are still there. People that demand products are still there.
- Deuce$
- 12 Comments
Oct 10 11:09 PM- Peter Lynch
- 37 Comments
Oct 10 11:31 PMI accepted long ago that I don't know and will never know where the stock market bottom is. Instead of spending my time trying to buy stocks at the bottom, I find it much more productvie to figure out which great companies I can buy at attractive valuation.
And let's not forget that buying a stock is only half of the equation, the other half, and probably the harder half, is to figure out when to sell.
- fatcat
- 436 Comments
Oct 10 11:55 PM- moonbat1775
- 564 Comments
My Website
Oct 11 12:34 AMHyperinflation, inflation, inflation.
So sad for our nation, our nation.
For the bankers:
just spam and bad rations.
- moonbat1775
- 564 Comments
My Website
Oct 11 12:50 AMI loath them, loath them, loath them.
I loath them hi and low.
I loath them with a loath I loath.
I loath those so and so's.
I loath them in the morning.
I loath them in the night.
I'll loath them till I loath to loath,
yet loath them more I might.
- thedozer
- 156 Comments
Oct 11 12:58 AMthat really was your best work yet! I read the post before checking the name...
I knew it was you or curbs...
I got my work cut out for me!
moonbat, do it then!
I'll have ya'll know, you keep me entertained I watch Karl Marx ride his horse into the white house...
I can't wait to see our posts about those policies...
Question: will the 'fairness doctrine' apply to blog posts?
- Distressed Volatility
- 47 Comments
My Website
Oct 11 01:19 AM- Jimmy Goodwin
- 50 Comments
Oct 11 06:28 AMNo, but there's no need to lie in such a convincing way, fooled the same people that he was trying to help.
- standfast77@yahoo.com
- 5 Comments
Oct 11 09:18 AMI have that date for you it's 12/21/12 per the Aztec calendar
- No Free Cake
- 18 Comments
Oct 11 11:56 AM- moonbat1775
- 564 Comments
My Website
Oct 11 12:55 PMSince I know government interference in the market place is only destructive and since I know they will continue to inflate, it is a no-brainer (convenient for me!) to guess we will eventually have hyperinflation or at least stagflation. No, I don't trust the USD. Eventually, the foreigners will get wise too.
- User 274468
- 2 Comments
Oct 11 12:57 PM- moonbat1775
- 564 Comments
My Website
Oct 11 01:06 PMSounds like the "greater fool" theory.
China, "fractional reserve central banking" is the "poison pill" of capitalism. Please move to 100% reserves or at least shoot bankers who go insolvent.
- walleke
- 8 Comments
Oct 11 02:16 PMWhether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer
The slings and arrows of outrageous losses,
Or to take arms against a sea of sellers,
And by opposing end them? To go bust: to lose more;
No more; and by going bust I say we end
The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks
That my brokerage account is heir to, 'tis a consummation
Devoutly to be wish'd. To go bust, to lose more;
To buy: perchance to reocver: ay, there's the rub;
- No Free Cake
- 18 Comments
Oct 11 02:21 PMPrepare another one for later. If you think the sell/don't sell is hard ... if you sell wait until you are faced with the decision whether to buy back in ... now, later, now, later, argh!
- moonbat1775
- 564 Comments
My Website
Oct 11 02:36 PMBrilliant!
"... now, later, now, later, argh! "
Ain't an unstable financial system great? But that is what people get when they accept a dishonest banking system.
A "nation of stockjobbers" indeed! (Paraphrase or quote from T. Jefferson.)
- Did U Think The Ponzi Scheme Would Last?
- 159 Comments
Oct 11 05:12 PM- raylopez99
- 82 Comments
Oct 11 07:24 PM- Smarty_Pants
- 828 Comments
My Website
Oct 12 12:23 AM