johnthebear

Comment Stream » DIG

Comment Stream
Filter comments by:
Highest rated Latest comments
Or filter by symbol:
  • ProShares ETFs: Why Volume Trading Makes a Difference
    John the bear wrote on June 28:

    I am amazed that there is a way to get a 2:1 ratio against an index, and I admit to investing without knowing all the facts.

    I would appreciate it if you could explain how the process works so that I will have greater confidence in the future as my profit keeps expanding my holdings.

    Please try to find an answer for me.

    Have you asked ProShares to explain it to you?
    Jun 30 18:41 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • ProShares ETFs: Why Volume Trading Makes a Difference
    I invest in ultra short FXP (China) and SRS (Dow Jones RE index) and have done very well with both. Trades have executed quickly and I chart each in Yahoo and include the FXI and IYR to compare trends as to which is moving up faster.

    I am amazed that there is a way to get a 2:1 ratio against an index, and I admit to investing without knowing all the facts.

    I would appreciate it if you could explain how the process works so that I will have greater confidence in the future as my profit keeps expanding my holdings.

    I appreciate ProShares and the opportunity they have provided to the small investor.
    Jun 28 09:02 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • ProShares Ultra and UltraShort Sector ETFs: Does 2 = 2?
    IYR was down today -0.36% while SRS was up +2.76%. How do you explain that relationship if they try to balance on a daily basis?

    I am not complaining that SRS was up more than 2 x .36, that is not the point. The real problem here is that the -.36 does not look correct for the index when compared to the average of the top 9 funds that make up the index were down -12.24% or an average of -1.36%. I don't have the average percentage gains of all of the funds that make up IYR and I realize an average of percentage numbers is not accurate, but it makes me wonder what happened.

    But if you take 1.36 x 2 = 2.72% which is very close to actual amount that SRS increased at 2.76%! So did they lose the 1.0 factor or was the index flawed?

    Does anyone know exactly how the manage to keep the two indexes as close as they do? Thanks, John

    Apr 11 17:30 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article

johnthebear's Comments Stream Stats

  • 256 Comments, 3 , 0
  • Total Comment Stream rating - = 3