swaps

comments72
  • Positive ratings +5
  • Negative ratings -2
  • Net rating +3 or 71 %
Filter comments by:
Highest rated Latest comments
Or filter by symbol:

Latest Comments
72 Comments

    • Sun Nov 30th 16:04 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 -1
      Commented on:
      When a Publicly Traded Hedge Fund Blows Up
      Right.
      After stealing so much wealth through bonuses and stock options - distributing excessive wealth to themselves - they then turned it over to hedge funds to make them richer. The hedge funds then borrowed out of thin air fiat money from the banks and proceeded to bid up the prices of everything from houses to oil to public stocks.

      They pushed prices to high the sheeple upon whom this whole charade rests was unable to keep up because the banks would not leverage their own modest bank resserves by 10 or 20 to one.

      Collapse.

      The destruction is being felt by all but the greedy graspers at the top of the pyramid have no tolerance for economic pain - and screamed for the bailouts to restore their illbegotten fiat money.

      Conde Nast Portfolio predicts thousands of hedge funds will go out of business. Good riddance. But that likely means the wreckage they have left in their wake - still held by us unleveraged sheeple - will grow back to the sky much more slowly.

      It will be sustainable, hopefully.

      As for the hedge fund managers - why shouldn't they be out of a job? They were too stupid to actually hedge.

      And when they reincarnate into their new lives on Wall Street, they will still be stupid - but less stupid than the next wave of people who throw their left over money at them.
      View article »
    • Sun Nov 30th 15:50 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Why Didn't We Stop the Market's Chain of Events?
      The ruling elites in economics and business generally put too much faith in the Federal Reserve Bank, which has replaced G-d. It is the dispenser of prosperity. It is the angry god who then raises interest rates to put people out of work, close down businesses and "kill inflation."

      That latter comment though may be the key. Since the Federal Reserve Bank was created out of thin air in 1913 the value of a dollar has fallen to a nickle. A 95 percent drop in purchasing power.

      With such relentless ongoing inflation constantly underway it was logical for all of us to assume the costs of housing would grow to the sky. We were like Pavlovian's dog, mentally conditioned.

      Everyone should know that when the pundits on business tv praise the Fed as an inflation fighter they are speaking in code.

      What happened was that the relentless inflation of the Fed ran head first into globalism, which has been working - through outsourced jobs, massive inflows of cheap labor and a general deconstruction of U. S. productive labor - to bring the U. S. wage structure down from its peak because a more level playing field is required for globalism.

      Of course the people behind the Fed are globalists too. Its just that they were too stupid to get the big picture of what they were doing.

      The result was massive deflationary holes in the all the major controlling puppeteer banks. The huge bailouts have attempted to fill these holes.

      But the deflation of wages meant that workers could not keep up with what they were expected to pay for fuel, food or...homes.

      The economists did not see this coming. Because they have been mesmerized into Fed fans.

      Instead of constantly arguing whether the Fed should artificially manipulate the world by creating money out of thin air - and charging us and the government interest to boot - the argument should have been how quickly can The Fed be put out of business along with the racketeers who are part of it.
      View article »
    • Wed Nov 26th 00:22 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      The New York Times Company: Bargain or Value Trap?
      I bought some nyt earlier this year and have suffered along with bigger investors who are much wealthier and smarter than me.

      This analysis certainly constrains me from averaging down and buying some more.

      I do know the Times has an ownership position in the Boston Red Sox and Fenway Park but I was not happy that money grubbing investment bankers - now discredited as frauds - talked them into selling off tv stations and other holdings. While tv and magazines are languishing too, the Times management should have held on to its broader base of assets. If nothing else, tv is arguably more digital than print.

      TV would have picked up some political advertising that newspapers cannot capture at all anymore.

      View article »
    • Wed Nov 26th 00:13 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Can a Broken New York Times Be Fixed?
      Since 9-11 40,000 newspaper jobs have been lost.

      That's because people can and do go online and to meetups and learn a lot of documented anomalies about 9-11 that have never seen the light of day in mainstream media.

      The media is dying from massaged content.
      View article »
    • Mon Nov 24th 20:45 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Why Should Companies Pay Dividends?
      I think setting aside some profits and paying it as a dividend is a good discipline for a company. In theory, it motivates them to cover the dividend in their operations. Too many companies retain earnings and then blow it on wasteful ventures.

      On the flip side, a company like brandywine reit has lowered its dividend for 2009 to $1.20, which is says it can cover. I bought some more shares at $4 and will get a 30 percent yield. But the danger is any naked short sellers will scream at brandywine to cut the dividend and conserve cash because they don't want to cough up payments for the uncovered shares they've sold.

      Right now, companies that can cover dividends will be really pressured to cut them because of the extraordinary yields. - like enlay.pk at 18 - 20 percent.

      But i think they should pay out the money whether the yield is 2 percent or 20. If they stay the course - and are not burning through cash like gm - they should get a quicker recovery once it is morning again in America.

      Mature companies need to kick back some of the wealth to all holders, rather than immorally divert it to management options at obscene levels.

      D
      View article »
    • Sun Nov 23rd 10:28 AM
      |
      Rating: +2 -1
      Commented on:
      Manhattan Mansions Fall from the Sky - Barron's
      Actually, the most vile of these deconstructors of the american dream are not losing their homes. It's just that they swapped fiat credits for luxury homes that have gone down in value. But they are still relatively even with the market. If they sell fheir former $6 million for $4.5 million the former $6 million home they buy elsewhere is now only $4.5 million too.

      The ones to pity are the former $3 million home owners now stuck in a $2.25 million home that they can't sell to trade up to a $8 million home now knocked down to $6 million.

      I mean, why must these people suffer after all they have done for the rest of us?

      I think the entire Wall Street matrix - which does nothing but talk on the phone and shuffle pieces of paper - should be outsourced to India. Those people have lower cost structures and would hopefully rip less out of our accumulated capital base for their own enrichment.

      Still can't figure why a guy can walk into a bank and end up in prison for walking out with $10,000 obtained at gunpoint when white collar criminals - using the chicanery of stock trading - walk off with a few million fiat credits scott free.

      Look at how Dr. John Malone appropriated $1 billion of shareholder value from his various liberty reincarnations of tele-communications - all through stock options. And look how these companies have performed over the last 10 years.

      Even recently one of the liberty clones burned through something like $30 million of its capital - isn't capital king these days? - to take some stock off his hands. And the move, by reducing overall outstanding stock, only strengthened his strangehold.

      This destructive greed has not only been on Wall Street, but inside the corporations whose paper stock and bonds they ruthlessly churn.

      And how about those rating agencies and their highly overcompensated overseers.

      And why should regulators who failed to regulate still cling to their federal jobs and perks?

      Maybe we should sue the regulators to recover wages and benefits paid to them the past few years.

      But we won't. After all, they did not walk into a bank and use physical intimidation.
      View article »
    • Sat Nov 22nd 09:22 AM
      |
      Rating: +2 0
      Commented on:
      Geithner, a Man Who Doesn't Lose His Cool
      Geithner has never been an investment banker, as I understand it, so he is not part of that crowd. Instead, he is one of the regulators, who have been functioning as dysfunctional enablers.

      Is he really cool, or just on heavy doses of Prozac?

      I agree, Amvet, this county needs a clean sweep of the greedy ones who have walked away with fortunes while bankrupting society.

      Dan
      View article »
    • Fri Nov 21st 09:55 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Bailouts and Bankruptcy: The Code Needs a New Chapter
      Interesting idea.

      The new owners would be the bond holders, which would make the company debt free except for taxes (hah) and pension liabilities (hah hah). The courts would overhaul the latter. Don't know if bankruptcies give GM a tax loss carryforward.

      But there might have to be a smaller injection of operating capital that would have to be additional "stock" owned by the public, or actually the semi totalitarian federal goverment.

      But this does seem like a rational way to keep a business going without having the Chinese pick it up for a song and a prayer.

      View article »
    • Fri Nov 21st 09:48 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Ugly
      Jadzi candidly admits he and many co workers are sitting around with nothing to do.

      I briefly dated a brilliant but bipolar woman who made big bucks at Lockheed Martin. She said half of her department was disfunctional.

      I have long thought what Jadzi and she said are signs that big corporations are

      too big to manage.

      This thinking started when the O-ring problem caused the explosion of the Challenger on the launching pad.

      It was vindicated when AOL and Time Warner merged, proving no tree grows to the sky.

      GE is the latest supporting evidence.

      View article »
    • Fri Nov 21st 09:41 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Calling a Depression
      We have a depression in the stock market and one well underway in the financial industry.

      A broader economic depression won't happen until tax revenues become so bad the huge government sector on all levels has to lay people off too. Right now, government and utility employment some sectors of the basic food are a drag on a depression.
      View article »
    • Fri Nov 21st 09:37 AM
      |
      Rating: +1 0
      Commented on:
      General Electric: Genuine Risk of Collapse?
      This article is definitely not superficial or poorly researched.

      Several comments about Jack Welch but not one mention of what could be poor judgment by Warren Buffet.

      View article »
    • Wed Nov 19th 15:36 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Isn't Deflation a Good Thing?
      I fully understand the concept that massive creation of new money should lead to massive inflation. That has worked in the past.

      But it appears much of the new money being created out of thin air is just to plug huge holes on balance sheets where credit (money) has evaporated. While there may be trillions of new "dollars" out there, are these dollars not actually just credits - obligations to be repaid? because that is what modern fiat money is. A credit against a debt. Much of the private debt has truly evanesced into the mist, never to be seen again. Thus fiat credit dollars have been lost forever.

      Inflation is caused by huge buying pressure from below, which pushes up the cost of goods. But excess compensated rich people can do even more to push up inflation through leverage. Really rich people had so much excess money they turned it over to hedge funds, which then borrowed "out of thin air" money manufactured by the banks to leverage their rich people's contributions 10 fold or more. Then this out of thin air money was unleashed to buy up the prices of stocks, commodities, non-existent fraud mortgages etc. Basic commodities like energy got pushed up so high by this hot air money the buying pressure obviously exceeded the actual buying pressure from fast growing countries competing for post-peak oil. In turn, the consumers had to stop buying so much of a high priced commodity.

      You can only deductively reason that the out of thin air inflationary dollars overpriced tangible assets from oil and steel to Brandywine Real Estate Trust and Freeport Moran and Fortress Investment Group. Because no tree grows to the sky, the puncturing of the containers holding these hot air credit dollars did indeed evaporate into thin air.

      There does not seem enough hot air dollars salvaged in reserve to pump up asset classes anytime soon. That will require banks to start pumping credit dollars out of thin air again, but they are reluctant to do so.

      And we will not have inflation until conjured up credit-collars are once again in the hands of the little people at the bottom of the pyramid.

      A 5.8 percent payment boost for Social Security recipients is a start, a weak start, but a start toward getting money lower down on the social class structure.
      View article »
    • Sat Nov 15th 19:03 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      As Italy Enters Its Fourth Recession Since 2000, Who Will Bail Out Unicredit?
      I agree that the current financial crisis is potentially more serious because it is so widespread. But I think the naked short sellers are ruthlessly driving down stock prices farther than they would otherwise go, and this is leveraging the downturn as well.


      I fail to see how the close linkages that come with globalism are really great for the New World Order because we now have everything more in lockstep and there is no fluctuating equilibrium from more random separate parts.

      Clearly, the highest elites have been displaying the most panic, and this panic is becoming more self fulfilling as industries that might just slow are starting to brake more rapidly from fear.


      But I recently used this panic to buy some Enlay.pk, the Italian electric utility I made money with and sold last year. But I bought it at 7 and now it is like 6.4 but I am still getting a 19 percent dividend yield, for now, from my purchase price.

      It is interesting that the prior post points out the Austrian dominoe effect that is suspected as the first falling dominoe that led to the depression. And now small Austria has a far higher negative influence again, compared to the larger Italy.

      This is all so strange. Is this financial crisis an accident, an unintended consequence, or a carefully thought out conspiracy to create a crisis that requires a more integrated global solution?

      Dan
      View article »
    • Fri Nov 7th 11:56 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Obama to the Rescue?
      Interesting that his chief of staff is a citizen of both Israel and the U. S. and reportedly served in the Israeli military.
      View article »
    • Tue Nov 4th 15:50 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Gold Coins Are in Short Supply, So Why Doesn't Their Price Rise?
      Silver bullion is nonexistent too. Went to a small gun show two weeks ago and the lone coin dealer has numismatic offerings but zero gold coins or silver bars and rounds.

      If you cannot buy gold, consider buying commodities that are tradeable in hard times. Or forward buy the things you would buy with gold in hard times - dehydrated meals, tp, firewood, canned foods, canned meats, ammo, guns, farmland etc.
      View article »