irondoor91

Latest Comments
120 Comments

    • Sun Nov 30th 19:19 PM
      |
      Rating: +1 0
      Commented on:
      How Wall Street Has Failed the Individual Investor
      There are many denials of reality which automatically disqualify millions or people from joining the ranks of successful speculators. For instance, to moan that “manipulators”, “insiders”, “they”, “the big boys”, “program trading”, “hedge funds”, "the Fed" or "the government" are to blame for one’s losses is a common fault. Anyone who utters such a conviction is doomed before he starts. By my observation, after more than twenty years in the business, the biggest obstacle to successful investing is the failure to merely even recognize and accept the simple fact that losses are part of the game, and they must be accommodated. The perfect trading system does not exist. Expecting, or even hoping, for perfection is a guarantee of failure. Speculation is akin to batting in baseball. A player hitting .300 is good. A player hitting .400 is great. But even the great player fails to hit 60% of the time! He even strikes out often. But he still earns seven figures a year, because although not perfect, he has approached the best that can be achieved. You don’t have to be perfect to win in the markets, either; you “merely” have to be better than almost everyone else, and that’s hard enough. If you don't know what you are going to do in order to be successful on a daily basis, you have no business risking any of your hard-earned money in the markets.

      I know that's difficult to accept, but by now everybody has learned how easy it is to lose when all you are doing is "hopin' and prayin"
      View article »
    • Sat Nov 22nd 11:54 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      General Electric: Genuine Risk of Collapse?
      You already have the loss and you acknowledged it. Your mother should sell at least half of her position (hope its not her only asset) and realize the tax loss this year (depends on her basis, of course). She then has loss carryfwds for years. Take the money and broadly diversify, with at least 50% into laddered insured CD's. Remember, GE can (and probably will in the next 18 months) cut the dividend.

      This is not the time to be brave, but time to preserve capital and fight again another day.


      On Nov 18 08:26 AM Help me please wrote:

      > Hello! My mom used to own $1,000,000 of GE stock, and now down around
      > the worth of $300,000. She won't sell because she thinks it would
      > be a waste. Won't it eventually go up in the next ten years. Do you
      > recommend to sell at such a loss? I'm worried. Comments?
      View article »
    • Sat Oct 18th 22:51 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Hedge Funds Suffering in the Background
      These funds appear to have forgotten that one of their objectives has to be the avoidance of significant losses so they can play the game another day. Don't forget; for every loss, there is someone on the other side of the trade.

      They need better risk managment and better hedging strategies. If they aren't or can't hedge, they should avoid the asset. Simple hedging strategies are avialable to every retail investor, and all of those plus greatly increased complex and sophisticated hedging is amply available to the large hedge funds.

      Here are just a few: If you are long stocks, buy Put options on individual stocks or ETF's or indexes; short the eMini's for greater leverage; short a comparable basket of stocks or ETF's in a margin account.

      Though it is very difficult to find a perfect hedge, the tools are available in the equity markets. It takes better skills and experience than mine to hedge fixed income or private equity.

      Remember, these are supposed to be "hedge" funds. That is one of their selling points and a primary reason that institutional investors buy them.
      View article »
    • Fri Oct 17th 12:29 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      The Most Dangerous Place to Get Investing Advice
      Again, another template from a "common sense" commentator.

      The example cited, Cisco, has been selling routers forever. At the top, it had a P/E of 132:1, a market cap of 543 billion and sales of 12 billion.

      Today, the P/E is 10.5, it has sales of 39.5 billion and a market cap of 104 billion.

      The stock price today, around $17, is the same as it was in November, 1998. Cisco has never paid a dividend.

      If I am a long-term investor, could somone please tell me why I should be interested in buying Cisco today? Will the E of the P/E continue to increase, will the P/E ration expand, will they sell more routers, will management continue to perform, etc. etc.

      If Cisco can double, why can't it be cut in half? Last question: how many products, companies, financial statements, management qualifications, etc. can the author be an expert on?

      Don't you see that this is the same sales pitch that every mutual fund manager, private equity manager, etc always make. These fundamental approaches are 99% of the way its sold in the professional marketplace. Only 1% of investors rely solely on technical analysis. I don't have it in front of me, but I would guess that the vast majority of the Fortune 400 have made their money in private businesses that later went public, in leveraged real estate or some form of commodity business such as oil.

      There will be very few professional money managers in the 400. Maybe a while ago, but not today.
      View article »
    • Wed Oct 15th 10:04 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Wednesday Outlook: Staying on the Sidelines
      Yikes! Gabe is a realist. At least he puts his money where his mouth is. Gabe, you did post your positions, didn't you?
      View article »
    • Tue Oct 14th 10:10 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      The Dangers of Timing the Market
      Most general equity mutual funds (approx 85%) cannot beat the market even when they are supposed to be more or less fully invested.

      Statistically, half of the top quartile funds in one year or five year period will fall into the bottom quartile over the next measurement period. And, of course, the inverse is true that half of the bottom quartile funds will end up in the top half over the future period. Investors tend to be in active funds rather than the index funds, since those are the ones that their advisors recommend, they are always chasing the top performers, which are naturally going to be underperformers in the future.

      Active mutual funds investors' returns are approximately half the market returns because of this chasing plus the layers of fees inbedded in the funds and the overlay of advisory fees.
      View article »
    • Sun Oct 12th 00:24 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      How Low the S&P 500 Could Go
      If most people are bullish does that mean a top is near? Not quite, it takes a long time to kill a bull market. But, we've done it now and the bear is in charge. He's not done yet till we find out how many people still have large allocations to stocks in their 401-k's. They'll be bailing out after the air is let out of their bubble again soon.
      View article »
    • Sun Oct 12th 00:05 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Decades of Negative Returns: A Long-Term Look at the Dow
      So long as you need to find someone else to blame (repub or dem or short sellers or hedge funds, etc) you will never get it. You, you, you, are the one in control of your own decisions and destiny. You have to live it out day by day.

      Some day far down the path when you are old and broke, you will lament; "If only I'd gone short in 2008".
      View article »
    • Sat Oct 11th 13:05 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Reading the S&P 500's Crashing Waves
      I follow EWI and subscribe to their publications. I attemp to follow EW theory and wave count, though I am by far no expert and tend to get caught up in the never-ending show of governmental attempts to "fix" the "problem" and "instill confidence", as if the President can do such a thing by speaking every morning at 10:30. You can see how much confidence he "instills" by watching the market action as he and Paulson appear before the cameras. Same for Congress. I must apologize to myself for being human and allowing my own emotions to override my strategy from time to time. But who doesn't?

      Not only has the EWI Financial Forecast generally been right about the wave count (though it is by design backward looking) and the relationships about wave segments, it has damn sure saved my financial bacon in the stock market. Keep in mind that the waves of buying and selling are the psychological expressions of the mass public. The stock market is their mirror and at this time in history it is expressing fear and loathing of stocks, commodities, bonds (except treasuries) and flight to safety.

      The author of this article clearly explains the current status of the market and the wave count. He describes waves 4 and 5 and what they will likely lead to. However, he is not painting the entire picture. The 5th wave he is illustrating will not be the end of the c wave. We are currently in the 3rd Minute wave of Intermediate wave (3) of Primary wave 1 of Cycle wave c.

      This implies, if correct, that there are two more waves remaining of Intermediate wave (3), to be followed by Intermediate waves (4) and (5). Following those, next to come will be Primary waves 2-5, each with its own sub-sets of 5 Intermediate waves and each Intermediate wave with its own subset of 5 Minute waves.

      Once Primary wave 5 is complete, Cycle wave c will be over. By that time (several years), the stock market could be back to the levels of 1974, the previous Grand Supercycle wave IV. Somewhere in the vicinity of 400 on the Dow.

      Will it work out like this? Nobody knows, of course. But the unthinkable is happening around the world right now. Nobody would have predicted 40% off the market a year ago either. Nobody would have predicted the failure of virtually all the 100 year old investment banks, AIG, Freddie and Fannie and on and on.

      When GM, Ford, municipalities and states are declaring insolvency and the Federal government finally realizes that it does not have the power (brain or financial) to put it all back together again, we will be living in a much different world.

      Cash and short funds have been the best investment recently. Cash has beat everything else over the past 10 years. It is still king.

      View article »
    • Wed Oct 8th 13:49 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      What's an Investor to Do - Patience or Panic?
      Panic (or selling out your positions) is a natural reaction and is vitally important for self-preservation. This is something that our ancestors learned thousands of years ago when they observed other fellow humanoids fleeing in mass reaction to something that they themselves could not see. The instince to flee if the crowd is fleeing arose from what could happen if you stand around waiting to find out that the reason for the fleeing was the presence of saber-tooth tigers.

      Thus, it is a natural thing to do and nothing to get worked up about. Get out, sit in cash for a while and see how much better it feels. If the investor has a long time frame, he also has some extra time to reassess his risk tolerance (he may have just learned something about himself that he didn't previousl know). He can always reenter the market, since it is going to be down quite a bit anyhow.

      In other words, don't be stupid. Listen to your instincts and they will serve you well. If you don't trust them, just hire a nice stock broker.
      View article »
    • Wed Oct 8th 13:36 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Trading During This Crisis
      While holding a nice assortment of tech longs such as GOOG, BIDU, FSLR, CRM, SBAC (profitable on each of them over the past few weeks, so who needs to bother with crying about not being able to short the financials) I took a couple of shots at picking a bottom with SSO and QLD this morning.

      My head is lying across the room in the basket, having been handed to me several times. I'm retreating to neutral for the balance of the day and keeping my finger off the button. Hopefully, we limp in with only four digit losses. Right now, its not looking too promising.
      View article »
    • Mon Oct 6th 19:46 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Time To Go Long, For A Short Time?
      "it’s hard to imagine stocks staying below this level over the next year to three years".

      I don't know. Who would have imagined 10 years ago that an investor would have been fortunate to be a break-even on his Vanguard 500 Index fund in the next 10?

      Can anybody ever think the unthinkable?
      View article »
    • Mon Oct 6th 10:46 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Opportunity in Emerging Markets Amidst This Panic
      Frear is a natural reaction, and it has a positive intention; to protect yourself from danger. It originated thousands of years ago when man saw others of his species running in panic. He didn't stand around waiting to see if it really was a saber-tooth tiger. He just ran with the herd that had alerted him to potential danger as he had been trained to do.

      On the other hand, when man is hunting for game he applies patience, cunning, stealth and a small group with killing tools. He knows better than to charge in the direction of his prey. As he becomes better equipped to kill, many gain complacency and the highly skilled begin to supply others with meat as they become dependent on his hand-outs.

      But those who became complacent and dependent lacked survival skills. They were out of shape and couldn't escape.

      Sound familiar? It should, because we are seeing it play out today in our citizens who are sitting on their portfolios and 401-k's like deer in the headlights. "It'll come back" is the refrain. Don't panic. Diversify. etc.

      By the time this decline accelerates down past the 8500 level, true panic and the herding instinct will set in. But it will be too late for many. They left too much of the decision making up to others and had let any skill in it that they should have acquired before investing wither away. All they have left now is either indecision or panic.
      View article »
    • Fri Oct 3rd 09:00 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      The Real Reasons Fertilizer Stocks Are In the Dirt
      The longer one continues with fundamental analysis and value-based investing in these names, the more money will be lost. The question is, how are these companies going to perform in a deflationary environment, and how do they scale back to respond to it.
      View article »
    • Sun Sep 28th 09:55 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Fooling Around a Financial Black Hole
      Look at history. Government bailouts in a Bull market; the market continues to advance. Government bailouts in a Bear market; the market continues to decline.

      The market is much, much bigger and stronger than any government or combinations of of worldwide government. The government might as well issue regualtions that prevent selling on a down-tick.
      View article »