Malkiel

Total Rating:
0 / 0

590 Comments

    • Wed Aug 20th 15:40 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      The Disconnect Between Supply and Demand in Gold & Silver Markets
      You've got to love a good conspiracy theory, and this one was so entertaining I think it should get a Pulitzer for the new category of "financial fiction" while we sort out whether any of it may be true...
      View article »
    • Mon Aug 18th 18:01 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Fannie, Freddie Bailout To Wipe Out Equity Holders?
      If I were a significant shareholder in either of these companies I would be preparing a fight to force the chair and boards of these companies to reject bailout--after all, why accept saving the company at the expense of one's own investment? Tell Paulson to screw himself and see who blinks first when you threaten to burn down the company rather than give it away...
      View article »
    • Fri Aug 15th 18:12 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Everything They Tell You About Solar Is Wrong - Travis Bradford
      It's disingenuous to claim that wind can only be aggregated and that there are somehow more limits on it's effectiveness than solar. It all depends upon local conditions, which is why all the new technologies will prosper with the right products in the market. The central problem for the future is whether energy industries will win or lose the fight to keep individual homeowners with wind, solar/photovoltaic and solar/radiant equipment from escaping the grid with household power setups...
      View article »
    • Fri Aug 15th 18:05 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Predicting the Bottom in Gold
      Gold's long-term track record is no better than the currency or the economy as a whole. Did you ever know of a gold owner whose horde's value wasn't affected by the rest of the economy? Did you ever know an owner of gold who didn't live in an economy and under a government? Trade gold if you like, but never for a minute believe the hype surrounding it...
      View article »
    • Fri Aug 15th 11:54 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Financials To Resume Meltdown Momentarily
      "we always under estimate the consumer and their need to spend on themselves and their children without including intangibles"

      Be that as it may, over 2 million households will have been foreclosed by this time in 2010. I see those as households whose financial and emotional crises will take them out of the consumer economy for a decade or more. Doesn't 2 million households sound like a lot to you? I can't imagine the consumers returning to their place as the engine of the economy any time soon. Especially when the credit card debtors discover what the real estate debtors have, that there's safety in numbers and defaulting with the crowd is a sound strategy for the overextended.

      As for short selling, indicting a couple of traders and brokerages should do the trick. Nothing like a good execution now and then to keep order on the street...
      View article »
    • Tue Aug 12th 12:38 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Sears Faces Risk If Economy Doesn't Improve
      "He is probably on his yaht simping champage and eating cavier."

      Funny, but that's the essence of the problem here, isn't it? When your boy wonder has more money than god, what's going to motivate him to bust his butt to prove doubters wrong? You guys believing in his black box magic had better hope he's a guy with a massive ego, otherwise he'll do what any sensible billionaire will do and walk away to enjoy life in the Hamptons and let someone else sort it out...
      View article »
    • Mon Aug 11th 15:29 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Using Futures To Hedge Your House
      If you're one of those unfortunate California buyers who paid $700,000 for a 700sf 2-bedroom one-bath fixer-upper ranch built on a slab next to a freeway in 2005 you might want to stay permanently hedged...
      View article »
    • Thu Aug 7th 10:14 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      The Only Chart True Investors Need to See
      "Just when doesn’t really matter"

      Wrong, wrong, wrong, when you buy is almost the only thing that matters, much more important than your little portfolio mix formula. I can't remember which author went over this ground, but there's probably more than one analyst out there who's pointed out that people who did their buying at market tops did much worse in the long term than buyers who did their buying at market bottoms. The people who were fully invested in 2001 before 9/11 have still not caught up after 7 years with the people who got fully invested in 2003, and that interval may push out to 10 years or more. The person who got fully invested in 1929 before the crash appears not to have caught up with the person who got fully invested in the '30's until around 1991.

      Choosing a variety of stocks on the basis of some diversification formula doesn't ever rescue you from the need, at some point, to make a market timing choice. Your entry point and your exit point are crucial to your success and they are market timing matters, and no amount of puritanical dislike of market timing nor nostalgia for "value" investing can erase that problem...
      View article »
    • Tue Aug 5th 11:09 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      GM May Hit $200 Before Oil Does
      Agreed with cjwirth, peak oil is already passed. Some economic trends are governed by science, even for those who don't want to believe in science. If oil slips substantially from where it is it will be a big buying opportunity for stocks in a sector that's destined to see more "bubble's" in the coming decade as denial prevents alternative energy concepts from gaining faster traction in the marketplace.
      View article »
    • Fri Aug 1st 11:27 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      California Signaling A Housing Bottom? [Housing Tracker]
      "“Half off in a decent neighborhood is close to the bottom.”

      The fundamental to real estate is always median incomes for the district in question and competing discounts on rentals, not discounts off of current asking price. If pricing was artificially inflated in that market by unusual mortgages that allowed people to commit to higher home prices than they could ultimately pay, and those mortgages are no longer available to buyers on those terms, then housing prices will have to fall to a viable ratio to local median incomes (usually 2.5 to 5 times gross income). If home prices in those California markets are still above the high end of the ratio, then you can't be at a bottom.

      At the moment it isn't clear that even normal mortgages on normal terms are readily available to everyone who might normally qualify, so again we can hardly declare a bottom. On the other hand, there is statistical evidence that prices have stopped falling in some California markets, so we have to honor that mathematical evidence regardless of the explanation.
      View article »
    • Tue Jul 29th 17:31 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Seven Cities Show Slight Housing Price Gains in May
      Okay, Tim, so who's going to offer mortgage commitments to those eager bottom-fishers? Who's waiting to buy those mortgages and package them as securities for investors? Are there any investors buying that stuff again? We're not lacking for buyers any more, we're lacking for lenders...
      View article »
    • Tue Jul 29th 17:26 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      About That Silver Lining, Erin
      Because they put on the veneer of objectivity by having guests with competing viewpoints appear in various segments, and because they are less bluntly ideological than their fox counterparts (though lately much more so), we forget just how biased these people are toward the right-wing pro-capitalist view. Any economist worth their phd will tell you that the public sector, including "government" as the right wing likes to call it, is a permanent and integral part of any economy whose actions and motives and constituencies need to be understood and incorporated into any analysis of markets, not treated like an aberration that will go away someday if we only evolve further (the opposite is more likely by a long shot). The talking heads at cnbc, particularly the women, seem to have been indoctrinated into the pro-capitalist view in business school and never think to question any of its assumptions, including the assumption that markets are in any way "free" or that capitalism can exist without a parasitic relationship to government...
      View article »
    • Tue Jul 29th 17:15 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Oil vs. Natural Gas
      In the event of a severe oil price shock portions of the market will convert to natural gas or propane and compete for those fuels in the market, driving up their prices also. Nobody should believe that having any kind of gas appliances or heating system will save them from oil price shocks or availability problems. All of these fuels are part of the same fossil fuels production complex and the only safety lies in creating alternative energy technologies not based on fossil fuels...
      View article »
    • Wed Jul 23rd 17:17 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      7 Stocks for a High Yield Cash Flow Portfolio
      As per taxes, I think we all know the trick by now that you do this kind of investing on your tax-exempt accounts like your IRA or 401k, where all that paperwork on taxes doesn't matter. For your fun money it doesn't pay to do much of anything other than straight stock transactions (even certain ETF's contain some shocking paperwork tricks when you finally sell shares in a taxable account...)
      View article »
    • Fri Jul 18th 10:31 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      The Oil Bubble Will Meet the Same Fate as Tech, Housing
      All of these simpletons in your fan club probably couldn't even find China or India on a map. They probably have no idea of the demographic tsunami buoying up oil--1 billion Indians and 2 Billion Chinese who are becoming automobile owners. The population of the US is 300 million, or 10% of those two countries. Try to imagine the oil used to manufacture and drive A BILLION NEW AUTOMOBILES.

      If oil pricing stays flat at its current level for a while that will be a great gift because it will give us time to develop alternative energy technologies. Spending that time drilling new wells off Santa Monica will be beside the point given what will happen to demand elsewhere in the world. And while those other countries will be clever enough to do some of their own alternative energy development, it's unlikely the fruits of their labor will be anything we can just buy at Home Depot to run our homes.

      It's time to wake up and smell the coffee and stop being a nation of wishful thinkers who enjoy nothing more than bad-mouthing trends we don't like as "bubbles" that must be superficial and will therefore go away if we close our eyes hard enough...
      View article »
Loading...
Symbols:
Authors:
Quick Links:
Contribute an Article Become a Seeking Alpha Contributor

Transcripts

More Transcripts»